Mug & Donut

Thompson is a “genius”  descriptive and analytical , Biology + Mathematics = on growth and form , in a context where the theory of evolution was overrated and had no mathematical or physical basis, a formal and structural analysis that led to the morphogenesis and put it in the line of scientific and artistic time known to this day.

The most accurate methodology implemented by Thompson breaks the classical processes and includes the ability to describe and analyze the formal patterns of plants and animals within their natural ecosystems , and concluded his remarks with mathematical and physical results . After his work emphasises the unlimited vision we have about mathematics and describes the endless possibilities this demand, geometrical , physical , mechanical , etc. . Everything could be described and had a reason to be measured by mathematical analysis to be performed on any natural phenomenon , like a drop of water produced by rain, their oblique to act on their natural environment geometric qualities. Its more practical to perform these operations analysis method is known as coordinate , could make a graph analysis , and project the results modified and transformed these analyzes to support their views . Their analyzes ended with conclusions which included them spirals or mathematical relationships describing geometric number sequences like Fibonacci processes.

All topological and zoometric analysis performed through thomson coordinate method , was only the beginning of a practice research through the grid deformations and changes in the geometric parameters defining new comparisons between geometric descriptions of the same species : analysis implemented in mammals, insects and bone topologies , etc. . This led him to question the theory of evolution of Darwin and put on the table all these analyzes explaining evolution and transformation processes using mathematical , physical and mechanical methods.

The standardization of parameters never ceases to be a finite, limiting factor at first when we think we have an endless possibilities by means of mathematics, we forget completely the needs of the environment, not just expect that physics and mechanics tell us as relations or as a space; also are the sensations and perceptions Visual, visually alter objects and create new spaces, perhaps ephemeral spaces that mutate and evolve with the information they receive from each new environment in which they were implanted, with these changes in the way we discover the uniqueness of each new environment.

The indoor outdoor relationship has always been an endless topic in intellectual discussions , whether spiritual, philosophical , biological or physical.

Men is always involved in endless points of view and ideas, which are discussed under the term “the conditioned outdoor room” in how the necesity of create spaces with high standards , climatic controls , and re-create false enviroments simply to have “comfort” , which are caused by social criteria that lead us to implement these systems in our lives , and controls our metabolism, feelings and pleasures. Men did not dare to face in a more compatible perspective his physical needs with natural and virtual environments.

For so many years we have seen societies living in hostile places because of the immigration, places that no one had lived before and how, their ability to adapt is focused on meeting the needs of their know environments such as what happened to the colonists in north america, their ability to adapt led them to the creation of mechanical houses, totally detached from architecture environments and microclimate controlled by the machine and technology, and completely focused on your needs with out thinking their basic functions and programs.

As a contrasting example we saw ancient cultures as Pompeii and their ability to crete relationships with the natural surroundings , creating transitional spaces with gardens, overgrown with vegetation and sculptures that attempt to explain the large sensory ability possessed by this culture and how that inner space became and exterior. How to dematerialize the “inside” and rebuilt in nature and metaphorical elements within the natural landscape.

The changes in our natural environments always have to be simplified , so that our procedures and methodologies lead us to create sophisticated and complex scenarios that demand any unnecessary infrastructure, I tend to have more formal discussions and topological, new ways that invite us to think the commonly constructed surfaces, endless surfaces that help us to appropriate internal and external spaces as one. “An open no non-orientable surface in which Euler characteristic is 0 ¨, A Klein bottle in which we find no sharp edges and everything can be green yet functional, customizable and supports new technologies from 3.0

]]> http://legacy.iaacblog.com/maa2013-2014-advanced-architecture-concepts/2013/11/inside-out-klein-bottle/feed/ 0