This essay regarding the form, the creation of it, the transformation is very complex and full of knowledge to understand. The main factor or point of attraction is the way things first came to creationism; religious, inertia, Aristotle, and or Platon. But, how can something so simple be created? A bubble? a spherical shape? Really, it all comes to the same generation minimal point of a geometrical form. But then it all comes to change, transformation of the form , oscillation. But really when do difference and repetition come to a drastical point of reality?

“Actualization breaks the resemblance as a process no less than it does with identity as a principle. In this sense, actualization or differentiation is always a genuine creation.”

Embryogenesis, this is a much more complex subject that is taking in account by Delanda and Deleuze, its all about the creation of things, but not geometrical forms, what really happened inside an egg? Transformation, stretching, augmentation,  a whole kinematics of the egg appears which implies a dynamic. My reflection was the spaces created in this process, where full of other possibilities of form, and the possibilities of “real forms” and “virtual forms”.

The “ social Strata” a very specific subject, when a group of people has no equal access to society and this society subdivides and many different subjects. Rolls in society are like chain of events you can start scaling up, but not all of the time they form a center and the rest on the outside, “to transform a loose ranked accumulation of traditional roles into a social class, the social sediment needs to become consolidated via theological and legal codifications.”

For me it’s really difficult to criticize a built project of outstanding architects, but the rolex center has several things that in my opinion could be better. They say the most important part of the project is the communication with the landscape and the idea of not having walls, instead different levels in the floor that divide up the spaces. This idea is a bit out of place because the building is a totally squared form in the middle of a flat surface that has no interrelation with its surroundings.  And the idea of the curves and holes in the roof top just make this library in to a pavilion of walking surfaces. The structural part is very interesting, they manage to have a great stetic and build an almost clear space with no big columns of walls.

Reading: The Shape of Energy – Sean Llaly

WEATHERS Installation proposal

What is Energy? Could you really say it has a visual form? Or is it perceived by our senses? Many ideas rush through our head when it comes to the shape, construction or space of energy . “In physics, energy is a property of objects, transferable among them via fundamental interaction, which can be converted in form but not created or destroyed.” Humans have a multitude of senses; Sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch are the five traditionally recognized, using these will are able to approach to the shape of energy.  But what’s our roll in architecture? Sean Llaly explains how we as architects have used for thousands of years physical material boundaries; such as stone, steel, or glass, but are they able to transform this type of work? How can we use the shape of energy as an architectural material to build with?

“They become a set of building materials known as material energies that give the architect access to the new type of boundary edges that move from points, lines, and surfaces to gradients of intensities and fallouts” with these phrase we can approach to the future of architecture.  Imagine living in an era where you can switch on ad off boundaries that divide or form spaces, are we willing to transform our way of living to make this type of fantasy come to life? It a question we as architects are users of space have to answer.

“The shape of architecture is determined by the extent to which the physical boundaries of a defined territory are held at any particular moment.”In this point the importance of the boundaries became crucial; do we increment our starting energy point so that our boundary remains intact or grows and our external elements don’t overcome the shape in with energy shows itself. We can be able to transform in a grater life span and a diverse for of living and controlling our own space. “ Shape succession creates an architecture that is more agile and has innate ability to be upgraded.

The House N in certain way it’s a new way of conceiving space. Could it be possible to fell on the street but you are really in you own house and backyard, people walking can just walk in and have certain access to you first layer or boundary house? Its something amazing for our world and the way our cities work. Basically we have to come to a point as architects to be able to project interaction in space.  For my future subject i would like to investigate more about parametricism and the evolution of time in our “future architecture” are we going to change all of our way life? “an architectural environments poses an inbuilt kinetic capacity that allows those environments to reconfigure and adapt in response to prevalent occupational patterns”.

Future house