Maria Alexandra Polyakova, Eirini Aikaterini Papakonstantinou.

Team: Lubna Alayeli, Ceren Temel, Samuel Shapiro, Nina Jotanovic

First research on reciprocal grids and connections between members. [Inspiration]

Development of research during workshop through small scale physical models and Karamba analysis. [Workshop]

Conclusion and possible further development.

The main approach of this exercise for us was to find and test the some parameters that may influence the structures that are really work with tensional integrity or better to say tensegrity. So we tried to study the behavior of different geometries and joints, and figure out their impact on tensional behavior of a structure. Begining with a simple surface, some parameters were have been manipulated in both real physical model, and virtual simulations in Kangaroo. And Finally, we discovered a somehow balanced relation between geometrical patterns, joint types and supports, to distribute the loads in a double curved surface.

BY : Anusha Arunkumar, Silasalin Krisanarungkhun, Marina Lazareva, Mahdi Najafi

When designing a material system within the architectural field, the main purpose and the most basic analysis are about how the structure is able to transfer to the ground loads and forces and how efficient it can be in providing safe utilization by the users and achieving specific architectural solutions (they can be both structural and about aesthetic). Representing the first challenge in construction, structural behavior has always been needing experience, training and scientific studies.

According to these premises, it seems clear why during the last 500 years architectural practice moved from an holistic view that makes no distinction between structure, form and decoration, to a scenario in which the structure configuration comes mainly from an external professional that try to reach that specific architectural will. Nowadays we can detect currents that lead to a renewed vision of the design process, that takes advantage of all the disciplines available.

Computational techniques permit to change considerably the way in which the final shape and its performances will be influenced by modifying parameters as material, dimensions, supports, adding the possibility to create multiple structural relations within the same built environment. Needless to say, processing and scripting are only software and do not have to be considered as intelligent systems, but technical and artificial tools to reach a more productive and flexible working flow. Thanks to these it is possible to have a real time response of structural behaviors according to input parameters that can be modified in different configurations showing how the structure will work. What makes them really useful is the capacity of informing you in terms of data (stiffness, bending stresses, compression, tension, forces flows) that can be used to inform a new different analysis by the previous considerations. Simulating processes permits to save money, time and resources, while giving the freedom to focus on more complex relations.

In addition to the improvement of productivity and resilience of the process, computational techniques are used to create more and more complex relations between the parts of the system while making more tight and evident the connection between design and structure. In this situation, the two terms do not have different meaning or definition, but just the same motivation. That is why during the last years many studies have been developing regards the possibility to modify some material parameters in order to achieve better behaviors that are strictly related to the morphology and functionality of the design. One of the most competitive challenge is to decrease stress on the structural element thanks to its shape, position within the whole, material and self-weight, all of this features changing the approach to the construction.

For instance, the comparison between two structural approach as involving beams or bars in the project showed that, even if in both cases it is possible to conceive an intelligent material system, in absolute terms bars are more efficient. While beams host tension and compression, that merge in bending moments and shear actions, bars structure are conceived in order to present only axial stresses. Since these only moves in one direction we are able to lead the forces flow only in the pathway we want, toward to the ground, just connecting them through joints. From lightweight structures generated by this logic, it is also possible to reinterpret the classical beams through the utilization of bars that translate bending forces in tension and compression, reducing the overall behavior to a more efficient performance. Another strategy often used is exploiting the capacity of materials to be prestressed or preformed in particular shape that can be manipulate accordingly to the aim of the structure. In this sense, it is possible to play with the geometric pattern applied to the surface and directing forces and stresses along determined axis or curves that better fit the design goal.

The design idea was based on generating a shell cantilever structure with minimal foot print. For achieving this purpose multiple configuration were explored as an evolution, where each iteration was informed by the previous one. The final piece consisted in a folded structure, where the material thickness (counter balance), type and density of folds responded to local needs detected using Karamba.

Team: Ji Won Jun / Ninanda Kashyap / Nohelia Gonzalez / Matteo Silverio