The Qanat network, an amazing economic infrastructure under the lands of Tehran
Let the opportunities be in their right position ( An overall glance at Tehran’s Qanat network )
Posted in Uncategorized Comments closed
The Importance of Sustainability in Architecture and Economy
Reason of the foundation is the worlds most excellent gift for a man. Knowledge, however, has its limits. The creative spirit of the designers and architects seeks them overcome the craving for knowledge, not to enter the future to design space for the man soared to perfection. To achieve adequate knowledge architect must broaden their horizons, certain knowledge and in other areas, in particular cooperate with other participants in the process of developing a better future for man. The text discusses the need for sustainable urban development which is a prerequisite for creating a sustainable city, as the basic matrix of the city required for life and the future of the city. To address this man should has knowledge of urban development, urban environment, environmental problems and social and intellectual norms in society variable financial and political parameters. The large number of complex parameters are needed knowledge, patience, perseverance and wisdom of all of us, and every mistake is costly punishable.
Architecture-Design often lack the recognition of macroeconomic and microeconomic variables. Most economic analyzes have rightly spatial research. For this reason it is necessary to find a common language for proper functioning. Construction of a new language requires research, the concept of broader spatial analysis in the design, architecture, urbanism. All the oppressed wider context and factors. The mind needs to have environmental, economic, social aspect and political identity.
Is there a possibility to do something new? What we can change?
Ensuring an appropriate level of useful environment in the current urban environment today is a significant problem. Despite the development of science and technology, many elements of the environment are an urban problem today. To achieve this goal it is necessary to develop an awareness of not only the individual, but the entire society. Economics as one of the key factors should determine priorities, the importance of projects that are invested and thus result. I think that knowledge of one key problem is important for further decision. Therefore, if we are aware, for example, the current state of energy availability in the world we should find a way to improve it. The problem arises because of not developed awareness for the benefit of mankind. The investor is willing to invest in a building of several thousand square meters, regardless of its architectural and social value, considering it will brings him a profit. Nevertheless, sustainable architecture and sustainable resources are completely ignored, because it might be unprofitable in a given time. Energy efficiency is important as a essential for the survival of human society.
Where is the exit? In the future Humanity should be significantly turn to the use of alternative (imperative) energy sources. Knowledge of markets, development needs and potential as a whole, established investigation strategies and strategies of industrial development, are essential in order to identify desirable investors who want a clear insight into the situation and potential of each sector, to invest in what interests them. In the cities of earlier epochs environmental problems were mostly related to the lack of proper infrastructure, underdeveloped hygienic level, overpopulation, over construction and others. Nowadays, problems related to the state of the environment are much more numerous and reaching to the very complex problems of technical nature and psychology of urban living . In order to enable further progress of the human population, it is necessary the adoption and implementation of sustainable development. The basic idea of sustainable development is meeting the needs of present generations, without compromising the possibilities for future generations to meet their own needs. Sustainable cities allow the architecture to transform itself, not to be traditional but useful, innovative and economical. As a result we have design that rationally relates to energy use and refrain consumption of limited natural resources. How environmental imperative and a moral imperative become by the fact that designers are constantly exploring models that would be sustainable design is actually implemented in the modern trends of architectural practice. Some of the models, which were presented at the European market actually stress the marketing potential of “sustainable” investments, and so “green building” are more profitable than the label on the real estate market in developed countries. In this case, architecture and economy are finding a common language, not hinder each other.
Sustainable development is based on protection, so it is conditioned by the need to upholding the concept of nature in order to provide the resources and services necessary for life. From this perspective, sustainable development means improving the quality of human life within the limits of the capacity of the submission of ecosystems that support it ‘.
This definition of sustainable development is a normative concept that includes a standard of behavior that should be respected if the human community tends towards satisfying their own needs of survival and well-being. The definition includes three basic components, namely: economic, social and component of environmental protection, which form the basis of sustainable development. All three components are mutually linked and interdependent, and therefore require that everything is being done in the field of development is in line with each of them separately.
When it comes to urban sustainability, it must be borne in mind that cities have never been self-sustaining through history, and that they probably never will be in the true sense of the word. The city, as a man’s environment, had to meet its biological, environmental, social, economic, aesthetic and other requirements and needs that have evolved with the development of civilization. In addition, cities are ‘producers’ external influences on the environment, both positive and negative. How is the growing awareness of aspects of environmental pollution associated with urban living and quality of life in cities, increasingly provoking questions about the relationship of the positive to the negative impact and proof that this relationship is disrupted. As a result, more attentiveness to the capacity of the submission of a sustainable city overall area needed a system that would support life in the city, through the production of goods, resources and acceptance of waste materials from the city often called ecological rate city. It can be concluded that sustainable urban development can only be achieved if the system is established renewing his energy, human, environmental and technological potential.
Cities today are not only a reflection of the society within which the finding they are more a reflection of society is global. Or how Mumford wrote in 1961 in his book ” The city in history ”: ” … slowly we went from being a city that symbolizes the world, to the world that in many practical aspects of becoming a global city ‘. It can be argued that each generation has the right to regulate their environment according to their needs and capabilities, however there is also a parallel obligation of this generation to their successors, in the coming generations, leave enriched, and not wrecked space. The city is one of the artificial creation and its sustainable development in terms of ecological balance can be achieved only if all urban processes are controlled and synchronized with the laws of the natural environment. To achieve the goals of sustainable development, it is necessary to understand that cities play a significant role in this process.
As a development can take and developing of Dubai. Economics allowed expansion and development of the city. The city has in recent years significantly progressed, we can not omit the worldwide economic crisis, which did not avoid this town, but good economic organization allowed the continuation of his progress, urbanization, and lately concept of green architecture. Projects are based on hundreds of lesser energy and water consumption.
To answer the question of what is a sustainable city, it is necessary to sustainability seen in the wider context. It means that one should not only look and talk about the environment in the city, but also to take into account the role that the city has in a broader context. To achieve this goal should be to act as a company which has developed awareness about their future. The model sustainable city, besides it’s strictly defined physical boundaries, reflecting the social and matrix of the city . This model is manifested through a myriad of different forms, depending on the historical heritage, culture, economic base, climatic, geographic and geopolitical characteristics, to all these forms at the end reduced to only a few variables that determine it. Sustainable city no ” recipe ” behavior towards sustainability, but should have defined the elements of measurement achieved. The city can only be considered sustainable if its governing structure the entire planet is seen as unique.
Cities should be considered for places that serve its attractiveness as drivers of economic development in terms of creativity, innovation and the creation and sharing of knowledge, the stimulation of proactive innovation and educational policies, on sustainable construction, architecture and urban space use, the high development of the local economy, the exploitation of the architectural values, historical heritage buildings and public spaces through the development and reconstruction of the urban landscape.
Cities need to set the positive principles of urban spatial development, which will be based on:
balanced economic growth and territorial organized activities, with a polycentric urban structure, strong metropolitan region that can provide services of general economic interest, compact structure of settlements with limited urban sprawl, a high level of environmental protection and quality of life in the city and surrounding areas. Sustainable cities must have attractive open public spaces and promote sustainable, inclusive and healthy mobility in a way that cycling and hiking trails that are attractive, and public transport favored. Increased energy efficiency in buildings reduces the economic and energy vulnerability, and associated innovations, technologies and services in the building and energy are important drivers of local development.
Common approach to solving the problem of exclusion, the energy poverty and better housing conditions come to the key elements of development of the city so that the city becomes more beautiful and lively, but also more competitive and eco-friendly. Building a “green and healthy” cities goes beyond simply reducing CO2 emissions. We come to an integrated approach to environmental protection and energy sector in which many components of natural ecosystems are intertwined with those of the social, economic, cultural and political urban system in a single system. His influence is essential for avoiding rural depopulation and to promote balanced territorial development. The question is whether this problem can be solved on a global level in view of the disparities between the countries in the world have never been more obvious.How to awaken man’s awareness of the efficiency of energy resources and the value of what we have to do. Why not let the natural functions, existing natural techniques to be used for greater efficiency. Every place in the world has ups and downs, problems to be solved but the problem lies in spreading the incentives of his subjects.
Image references:
https://www.google.com/search?q=sustainable+dubai&biw=1600&bih=746&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=DEqGVO6IOcLxUpCJg-gP&sqi=2&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAg
https://www.google.com/search?q=sustainable+cities&biw=1600&bih=746&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=OkqGVNuRGYHlUri2gugP&ved=0CAUQ_AUoAA&dpr=1
Is an architect able to recreate a city in a way of becoming more future oriented in terms of sustainability?
Comparing Germany to Bulgaria and especially Berlin to Sofia is kind of difficult. The one thing they have in common is that both cities are capitals of countries in the European Union.
Berlin possesses unique cultural and architectural qualities, strong forces of social inclusion and exceptional possibilities for economic development. It has become a center of knowledge and a source of growth and innovation.
At the same time Sofia suffers from demographic problems, social inequality, social exclusion of specific population groups, a lack of affordable and suitable housing and environmental problems. In Sofia people want to become international but they are heading in the wrong direction. One of the challenges we confront, in particular sustainability, requires a change of lifestyle. This goes beyond switching off the light or not using water. This goes through a much more sophisticated and political process that will be very conflicted. The city governance role is to create conditions for changes in habits, lifestyle and modes of behavior.
Germany is a federal republic facing a system based upon democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and provincial/state governments. Due to this political system, Berlin with its 4.5 Million (about 5%) inhabitants will never get overpopulated even though Germany has the largest population in Europe with almost 82 million inhabitants. I admire the federal system of Germany because the concentration between the important institutions is distributed all over the country. Berlin is the political center and Frankfurt is the financial center of Germany. All major insurance companies are located in Munich, and Hamburg holds the biggest harbor. These are only examples to show that not everything is focused in the capital city. Due to this system of sharing the importance of cities, Germany possesses the best infrastructure in Europe. When you look at a satellite picture of Germany it is difficult to point where the capital is actually located. If you look at France for example it is quite easy to tell which city is the most populated one.
The Republic of Bulgaria has a population of 7.4 million and almost 25% of the country’s whole population is based in Sofia. Every important institution is located there. Bulgaria has the lowest per capita income in the European Union, while Germany has one of the highest.
Furthermore, the expansion of both cities is quite different. Sofia expanded from the central area and owns only one major center. Berlin however suburbanized the villages around it to create a city. Because of this and the fact that that Berlin was separated after the Second World War, it has three major centers and each district has its own minor center, therefore you would never feel like a place is overpopulated. In this polycentric city even the socially deprived districts are livable. Take for example “Prenzlauer Berg” or “Kreuzberg”. Both were socially disadvantaged districts, however nowadays both districts turned into hot spots for artists and designers. A lot of small coffee shops, bars and restaurants were created not only to attract tourists but also to create a comfortable place for the people living there. Berlin became one of the most favorite cities for Start-up companies. The capital is constantly changing and it is still really cheap to live there in comparison to other German cities.
However, Berlin is also facing some issues. There are many poor, homeless and socially deprived people living on the street. On the other hand, property prices have risen by 50% in the last ten years. A huge amount of people from eastern european countries, move to the German capital in hope of finding a job and getting more opportunities for a better life, but there is a lack of apartments, so a lot of these people end up living on the street. Berlin has to solve the apartment issue, one solutions being to heighten the buildings. Most of the apartment buildings have only five floors, there are no skyscrapers, so they have to provide more living spaces on top of the existing buildings for the people who want to live there. Another thing is that Berlin would face a huge problem, if the new airport does not open soon. Tegel and Schönefeld are much too small to handle the huge amount of passengers each year. If Berlin would like to keep its arising positive image, it has to provide a solution to open the new airport as soon as possible.
Sofia used to be in the same position as a European city, such as Prague and Budapest, but due to a wrong policy of privatization after 1989 it took the wrong direction. Bulgaria was not prepared to enter the European Union and that is why today is unfortunately the worst progressed country in the whole Union. Bulgaria has a unique topography with beautiful mountains, rivers and a long coastline to the Black Sea. Sofia has the potential to be a European capital with a wonderful ski resort bordering the city’s outline. Nevertheless only wrong investments were made to ruin the beautiful cities instead of changing them for the better. Take for example Sunny Beach, a touristic city near Burgas located at the Black sea. This was one of the most green and beautiful resorts in Bulgaria. Today when you look at it, you can see an immense density of hotels and holiday villages. This city is totally transformed into a seasonal vacation and attraction point for tourists. This touristic city borders with the ancient town of Nessebar. Nessebar’s abundance of historic buildings prompted UNESCO to include it in its list of World Heritage Sites. How is it possible to create an absurd place for vacation next to one of the most important historical places in Bulgaria? This is only an example, how a wrong investment policy without any master planning can destroy the vision and the image of a whole region.
Sofia, a city with an area of 492 km2, contains seven huge shopping malls all located around the city’s center. Most of these malls end up never being used, causing them in the end to file for bankruptcy. This is an example of wrong way to build and to lead a city. In my opinion the power of taking decisions regarding all architectural projects should not be given to just one person like chief architect of the city. In Berlin there is not such thing as ’’chief architect’’, but instead there is a whole team of professionals who are equally responsible for the decisions strictly regarding the Town and Country Planning Code. That’s the way it should be done in Bulgaria as well. Unfortunately in Sofia politicians have indirect partnerships with local construction and investment companies, which makes it hard for architects, outside that circle, to get the opportunity to get involved in larger scaled projects. Open architectural competitions should be introduced where a jury of professionals take the best suited proposal for a given project.
The problems of Bulgaria and Sofia in general, go far beyond the wrong investments made in the past. The whole ‘’system’’ does not work. The old generation is being completely forgotten and excluded. The highest pension in Bulgaria is about 350 Euro a month. How can you survive with that amount? You cannot even afford the basic health insurance. Former beautiful villages have now become ghost towns because the people leave and search for work in nearby cities. Due to the disappearance of the primary and secondary sector, people cannot survive in these villages. Bulgaria should start reactivating the primary sector, not only importing but start exporting their own goods. Also the industrial sector (the secondary sector) of Bulgaria has to be re-launched and start producing again. This is the only way to make people stay in their small cities or villages and prevent the overpopulation in Sofia and other larger cities.
How could Bulgaria be accepted as an equal member of the European Union when the majority of people can hardly survive. By entering the Union, life in general became much more expensive while the salary remained the same. The standard of the countries in the European Union should match in order to create one great Europe with its ’’states’’. Otherwise there will always be the prosperous countries like Germany and France pulling the poor countries like Bulgaria and Romania. With these conditions of poverty the people do not believe in their country and do not feel proud of Bulgaria. Without the trust of the people you cannot create a future oriented country. When you walk the streets of Berlin and ask people which is the best city for them; 80% of them will say “Berlin, of course”, when you ask inhabitants of Barcelona you will hear the same answer. I tried doing the same experiment in Sofia and not even one person gave me a positive answer. How can we change that? How can we make the people proud of their home cities and their country? It is not impossible. Nelson Mandela reached this connection of the people due to the Rugby World Cup in 1995 hosted in South Africa where South Africa won. Sport is a great way of making people proud of their country. Architecture can achieve the same result. In Medellin for instance the creation of emblematic architecture like the Spanish Library, made the people identify with, and feel proud of their city. People have to trust and to work things through together, otherwise a system cannot operate. In Sofia buildings are constructed on the assembly line without regarding the infrastructure or the surroundings. There is no planning at all and architects and investment companies look selfishly how to get the most money out of a project. We have to look at a bigger scale to find the best suited design for an area. Architects should discuss together and play in the same team to create the most advanced master plan for an area and stop working against each other. With architecture, we can to change the harsh separation between rich and poor, furthermore we can also build camps for refugees from countries in conflict, like Syria. We need to provide a better life for them in our country. Nowadays the government puts them in very small flat sharing communities without any work prospects. These people do not invade the country by choice, they are forced to leave their roots and their houses in order to save their families.
One of the biggest problems I see is that slowly the young generation and the professionals who could actually change the city, leave due to bad payments and a lack of work. These people are attracted by higher salaries from other countries in Europe and the rest of the world. How can we attract these people to return and help changing the country for the better? Without the young smart generation it will be impossible to catch up and actually succeed globally. One important point should be to create innovative and advanced technological parks to attract them and gain their trust in our country’s opportunities in order to to make this country efficient. In Tokyo for example, self sufficient barriers of the metro were created by using the people’s behaviors. When walking through this barrier, energy was created by every footstep people were taking. This produced energy was enough to feed this system. I like the idea to create sustainable and advanced architecture or design without making the people change their behavior. On small scale projects we should capture sun energy during the day and use it to fill the house with energy. These are only example of a possible approach but the key point is that in Bulgaria an advanced team of professionals with different professions which believes in creating a future oriented capital has to be formed. The politicians, especially the majors of the cities have to be key figures in that team and take a huge responsibility to make this change really happen.
As architects we cannot change the world, we can only point out the right way towards the future. Architects alone cannot do anything without having all of the people beside them. Together we should start acting like a well coordinated team that cares about designing a futuristic city. In my opinion that this is the only way to rescue Sofia, and hopefully Bulgarians from all over the world will start to head back. But first someone has to start that process of change and maybe others will follow.
photo: http://www.blue-marble.de/nightlights/2012
Posted in Borislav Schalev Comments closed
The artist with an agenda
Posted in shruti ramachandran, Uncategorized Comments closed
Embracing with Water before get soaked
Thailand, the country with the water, going back to the history of Thai culture, people live with the water or we can say “embracing with water”, everybody would like to build their own properties on the river banks not only because of the passive cooling that can turn the temperature of the house become cooler but also economic issue that the market transactions are happened around this particular area. There are full of typical Thai architecture such as raft houses, which could be adapted for practical use in city planning for communities along river banks. Most citizens take a benefit from river as the marketing channel to sell their products along the river which have the interaction between the habitat and the merchant created “Community” in each node of the city. If we zoom out to see macro-economic of Thailand, the main economy that driven Thailand for so long is “Agricultural”. Rice becomes the primary exporting products to overseas and Thailand is the number one country of world that export rice with much amount of quantities plus quality because of the soil and the weather and the water that make the farmer can crop the quality rice as we can see that Thailand economy and Thai society are always relevance with the water. Read More