Category Archives: Uncategorized

Primitive Future

 

intermediate spaces

Text Analysis:
In his manifesto “Primitive Future”, Fujimoto addresses the future of architecture as a return to a primordial, intuitive moment in the process of design, free of constraints and open for possibilities. He starts with relating architecture to a cave where the body needs adapt to the space to meet its needs. As the body adapts, the space takes on a new subjective and temporal definition, unique to each occupant. The cave represents a flexible architecture that’s more like an unintentional improvised space lying between nature and artifact.
In the text, Fujimoto describes the richness of in-between spaces, gradient spaces that lie between outside and inside, public and private, home and city. These are the porous places that are full with architectural discoveries. Spaces are created within spaces that blur into one another and have no definite boundaries or pre-determined routes through them, requiring the user to create their definition through use – akin to the cave or a natural setting. Therefore a part of the space is not a piece of the whole architecture, neither is the whole the sum of parts. Architecture shall be more abstract and absolute, formed of nested compositions producing more impurities and diversities that occur in-between intervals.
Fujimoto emphasizes the state of designing prior to division through which the architect should try to produce a unified condition where the interaction between natural and artificial is re imagined. He also questions the matter of scale and how it should be redefined when the exterior envelope disappear and the house becomes a city and the city turns to a huge house. Hence, new sensibilities may arise to enhance spatial qualities.

 
Read More »

Also posted in Lubna Alayeli, Students | Comments closed

Atmosphere: Tangible or Intangible?

Foto by:  CSABA DIGLICS, June 15, 2012

Case Study: “View House” by: Diego Arraigada and Johnston Marklee

Reading: “The Architecture of Atmoshpere” by: Mark Wigley

 

Atmosphere: Tangible or Intangible?

Is an atmosphere something that architects can construct? Is it what comes just after the physical construction and surrounds the building? Is it some sensuous emission of intangible effects? All of this doubts come to my mind when reading “The Architecture of Atmosphere” by Mark Wigley, in which he affirms that the goal of architects to control impalpable elements is a never-ending attempt. As architects we can envision projects that take into account and analyze most of the elements that are in the environment, to connect the changing climates with the material object, creating a relation between the atmosphere and the building. However Wigley expresses that trying to control the atmosphere through architecture is just a fragile illusion.

Read More »

Also posted in Stephanie Farah Carbonell | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Relational Logics – T1

Case study:                    Studio House. F451 Arqu itectura

Critical reading:         Bernard Rudofsky, “Conditioned Outdoor Room”

RELATIONAL LOGIC

The “Studio House” built in Gijon, Spain, is composed of four units which interrelate and form a unified construction integrated with its surrounding. The architects took into consideration two main elements during the design process; the energy efficiency of the project and its integration with nature. The Guest house emerges from the ground and then branches into the house and the atelier which are placed in a way to ensure a double orientation, ventilation and lighting. The fourth unit is the garage. The relationship of the Studio house with the ground varies according to the typology of the plan, which is a mixture of the modern house and the industrial warehouse. This relationship creates spaces such as the center covered exterior space which serves as a climate regulator.

In the “Conditioned Outdoor Room”, the author starts by showing how people want to control nature and the climate as much as they can, even if it means living constantly indoors or underground. However he believes they failed in this attempt since their control is restricted to the indoors.  According to Rudofsky, people need the outdoors since it is not only the air we breathe but it also is part of our mood, our skin color, our happiness etc. That is why he says we need gardens, the domestic gardens of the past which where habitable and had privacy, not the contemporary gardens which remain unoccupied. For people need to feel they are in their living room, but at the same time enjoy the sun, wind, and smell of nature. People need the outdoor living room; the garden. Rudofsky talks about Adam and mentions the wall which is a very important invention yet no one gave it enough credit. He also mentions Guinea and Pompeii, places where nature and climate are seen as the most suitable.

In both texts we notice an environmental relationship since both include nature; in the “Studio House”, the roof is green and the design is based on energy efficiency and in the “Conditioned Outdoor Room” the main idea is about the garden and how to appreciate the natural light, and wind. Positional Relation is evident in the way the walls are placed in a clearly specific way creating the different spaces. In both texts we notice the importance of nature and how humans should contribute to it; like a bird nest is part of nature, the houses we live in are part of nature as well and design decisions must be made while getting closer to nature.

The path that I would choose to research would definitely include the interaction between architecture and nature, adding the new advanced language of architecture including parametricism. As we may observe, parametric is mostly site, sun, vegetation, rain and nature related, it gives us precise information which we are able to use more freely and correctly in our designs. Having an environmental friendly construction does not mean it is on the expense of the design, on the contrary it can bring a lot more to its inhabitants as Rudofsky implied; being close to nature is not just breathing fresh air, it is also our mood, our skin color, and our energy, so we should make the most out of it.

 

stone-house- vietnam - Architects: vo trong nghia

Image: Stone House in Vietnam

Architects: vo trong nghia

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Relational Logics- T3

1-WgtnLUX-Atmospheric-Tessellation-02w

photo credit: http://www.detail-online.com/daily

theory paper 1

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Relational Logics

Case study: House N-Sou Fujimoto Architects

Reading: The Shape of Energy – Sean Llaly

WEATHERS Installation proposal

WEATHERS Installation proposal

What is Energy? Could you really say it has a visual form? Or is it perceived by our senses? Many ideas rush through our head when it comes to the shape, construction or space of energy . “In physics, energy is a property of objects, transferable among them via fundamental interaction, which can be converted in form but not created or destroyed.” Humans have a multitude of senses; Sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch are the five traditionally recognized, using these will are able to approach to the shape of energy.  But what’s our roll in architecture? Sean Llaly explains how we as architects have used for thousands of years physical material boundaries; such as stone, steel, or glass, but are they able to transform this type of work? How can we use the shape of energy as an architectural material to build with?

“They become a set of building materials known as material energies that give the architect access to the new type of boundary edges that move from points, lines, and surfaces to gradients of intensities and fallouts” with these phrase we can approach to the future of architecture.  Imagine living in an era where you can switch on ad off boundaries that divide or form spaces, are we willing to transform our way of living to make this type of fantasy come to life? It a question we as architects are users of space have to answer.

“The shape of architecture is determined by the extent to which the physical boundaries of a defined territory are held at any particular moment.”In this point the importance of the boundaries became crucial; do we increment our starting energy point so that our boundary remains intact or grows and our external elements don’t overcome the shape in with energy shows itself. We can be able to transform in a grater life span and a diverse for of living and controlling our own space. “ Shape succession creates an architecture that is more agile and has innate ability to be upgraded.

The House N in certain way it’s a new way of conceiving space. Could it be possible to fell on the street but you are really in you own house and backyard, people walking can just walk in and have certain access to you first layer or boundary house? Its something amazing for our world and the way our cities work. Basically we have to come to a point as architects to be able to project interaction in space.  For my future subject i would like to investigate more about parametricism and the evolution of time in our “future architecture” are we going to change all of our way life? “an architectural environments poses an inbuilt kinetic capacity that allows those environments to reconfigure and adapt in response to prevalent occupational patterns”.

Future house

Future house

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed