Category Archives: Uncategorized

Digital Logics / T6

httpwww.buildersmagazine.rouploadsarticole206_taiwan_tower_P02.jpg

 Digital Logics

Patrik Schumacher – Parametricism – A New Global Style

Yokohama Ferry Terminal – FOA Architects

Parametricism is introduced by Patrik Schumacher as a fresh approach to design with digital tools, where the ‘tools’ actually morph into a fully-fledged style, well suited to large scale urban planning as well as interior design.

According to Schumacher, this avant-garde style closes the transitional gap between the modernist/postmodernist, deconstructivist/minimalist era and present day, fulfilling most necessities due to its relevance in all scales. Its adaptability is also highlighted by its morphological nature and therefore superior capacity to articulate programmatic complexity.

Due to the increasing demands of the socio-economic state nowadays, ‘retooling’ was a necessary step. The increasing demand can be addressed by a rich panoply of parametric techniques: animation, simulation, form-finding tools, parametric modeling and scripting.

With this palette of techniques architects across the world strive to solve systematically connected problems. The over and above aesthetic recognisability as well as the wide spread, long term consistency of shared design ambitions and problems could justify the enunciation of a ‘style’.

A further aspect of parametricism as a style are its ‘heuristics’, as Schumacher describes them. Positive and negative heuristics dictate the rules with which parametricism as a style is to be approached.  Avoidance of linear shapes (squares, triangles, etc) is key as well as pursuing paths of research, guiding principles and preferred techniques  (parametric), which allow the work to fast forward in one direction.

Therefore the deep relationality is able to further coordinate pragmatic concerns and articulate them with all their rich differentiations and relevant associations. Even though the increased relational and digital logics aid in complex tasks, the new ‘style’ fails to live up to its full potential. Schumacher is reacting to the present state of things in the form of binary ideas, however he is not exploring further, or even attempting to envision a future, rather preferring to develop parametricism as a reaction to current situations.

The envisioning of the Yokohama terminal in its existent form was almost impossible with analogue techniques. The ease of execution would have been greatly increased through parametric techniques.

The interconnection of public spaces, structure and the existing pier can be viewed as a complex relational problem, possibly solved by digital relation tools. Great emphasis was put on the interrelation of these aspects, creating smooth topological transformation. Even without computational techniques the continuity between its different levels as well as the existing elements was overcome elegantly.

Though parametric techniques were not used exclusively, seismic activity was analyzed, monitored and relayed into the design using parametric means, ensuring horizontal and vertical forces are absorbed, as well as overall structural correspondence.

The execution of the Yokohama terminal highlights the associativity between part to whole, articulating the interconnecting elements in an elegant simplified manner. However the potential for greater efficiency of implementation as well as heightened speed at which such a project could have been completed remains open. No doubt parametric techniques would have aided the design hugely.

I am interested in the potential parametricism has in the future when certain design constraints and possibilities which have not been discovered or explored yet, may surface. It is also interesting to ponder whether parametricsm in such cases would truly evolve into a style or remain more of a design tool.

 

Case Study: Yokohama Ferry Terminal

Case Text: Parametricism ‘A New Global Style’, by Patrik Schumacher

Picture reference: http://www.buildersmagazine.ro/uploads/articole/206_taiwan_tower_P02.jpg

Also posted in Philip Serif | Comments closed

Digital Logics – T2

Case Study: Rolex Learning Center, Lausanna, 2010

Text Assignment: Deleuze and The Genesis of Form, Manuel DeLanda

DeLanda_Deleuze_Rhizome_Interpretation

Photo: https://pathtothepossible.wordpress.com/tag/deleuze-guattari/

Advanced Architecture has developed the capabilities to mathematically and scientifically, transform topological forms, address corresponding structural compositions, introduce complex variation, manipulate data, and even apply algorithmic patterns. These developments in tools and processes are affecting the way in which we think about architecture and how architects define their role in the rapidly-changing field.

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

DIGITAL LOGICS_T5

http-::thenextweb.com:wp-content:blogs.dir:1:files:2014:04:human-android


Reading text:
Toward a Theory of Architecture Machines – Nicholas Negroponte
Case study: Media-TIC, Barcelona – CLOUD 9 Architects

Nicholas Negroponte developed a theoretical framework on the need of machines to facilitate architecture. The “father” of the MIT wrote this article in 1969 where he describes that architects should join a partnership with architecture machines to create efficient architecture. At that time everything was created by hand and he revolutionary thought about the possibilities of machines to be self learning, self improving and adaptive. On the one hand he characterizes the architect as the teacher of the machine, but on the other hand he limits the work of an architect to minimum by suggesting a master machine, which can provide all necessary information to the other machines.

In my opinion machines should always remain tools for humans in order to make their work more efficient but not to do the whole work for them. A machine should support you, not decide for you. I admire his revolutionary thinking of advanced architecture at that time where even personal computers were not introduced but I think he exaggerates the role of a machine. His visionary machines have too much power and cannot be controlled. He portrays the creation of helping machines in a positive way but never describes how they their learning process could be controlled. If they can learn by senses, (see ‘’seeing machine’’) and to self improve, he is no longer talking of producing tools but a completely new race with a master machine as their main head. Architecture will be created on the “assembly line” and every design would be standardized. In that case, do we still talk about architecture? Machines as tools can help us research in terms of energy efficiency and sustainability and contribute to the protection of the environment and help us develop new strategies and materials to preserve our nature.

Take for example the Media-TIC, which was built in Barcelona in 2009 by CLOUD 9 Architects. This is a perfect example of an energy efficient building. Media-TIC was digitally designed and built using CAD-CAM processes (machines as tools). The 38-m high Media-TIC houses a photovoltaic cover on the roof. Rainwater is collected in a tank to cover the circulation of the building’s wastewater. All the facades of Media-TIC differently use the ETFE cladding, which allow savings of up to 20% of cooling costs. Media-TIC prevents the release of 114 tons CO2 into the atmosphere and is able to produce the same amount of electricity generated by 700 photovoltaic captors. The Media-TIC is just an example of sustainable architecture and we are heading the right way to create self-sufficient buildings, which will be the answer of futuristic architecture. The building industry has the biggest potential in being a leader in the energy management field. An architect does not need anything to do the entire work for him; he needs the right tools to make his research, his design and his final product the most efficient to help preserving our nature in order to save our planet.

In a future research I would like to realize how far we could probably go with technology and would it be still safe for us. Is it really possible to create self-learning machines? I am really concerned with the fact that a misuse of such an advanced self-improving machines will end in controlling us. Is this digital-era really helping us to live a better life or is it separating us from the real world? I am also really worried for the younger generation, which will completely lose touch with the reality.

Image: http-//thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2014/04/human-android

 

 

Also posted in Borislav Schalev | Comments closed

DIGITAL LOGICS – Growth and Form

This text was written by D’Arcy Thompson, this was his master work.

growth and form

His main thesis is that biological form can reflect physical and mathematical principles. For instance, the spicules of sponges adopt a number of characteristic shapes. D’Arcy argued that these were the consequence of slight differences in the “starting conditions” witch might well reflect some aspect of natural selection, but the resulting morphology of the spicules did not.

cvb

One clear demonstration of his notions of the dynamic influence of starting conditions lies in the morphology of shells and horns. D’Arcy Thompson showed that all horn and shell morphologies could be described in simple mathematical terms readily derived from the incremental nature of growth.

Shell

Even if a morphology was plainly functional, this did not imply for D’Arcy that it was incorporated into the genome by natural selection. For instance, geometrical rules of packing determine cell arrangements. These need not be specified, but can arise spontaneously. Yet the packing arrangement may be “useful” in minimising the space occupied by the cells, by maximizing cell-cell contacts, by establishing different categories of cells, “inside” versus “outside”, and so on.

figures from 'On Growth and Form'

Perhaps the most famous images from ‘On Growth and Form’ are the transformations. D’Arcy showed that gross variation in form between related species could be modeled by the consistent deformation of a sheet.

thomson

The consistency of the deformation is the crucial point here: it is obvious that any fish form could be made to look like any other fish form, if it were sketched on a perfectly deformable elastic sheet, and stretched in many directions at once. But D’Arcy Thompson showed that if the sheet were stretched in one particular pattern, then a new species form would be generated. This remarkable and curious observation has not been fully explained even today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Material Behavior in Deleuze and SAANA

Stuttgart

Photo: HygroSkin-Meteorosensitive Pavilion, by Achim Menges (2012)

http://www10.aeccafe.com/blogs/arch-showcase/2013/09/17/hygroskin-meteorosensitive-pavilion-in-orleans-france-by-achim-menges-architect/

Read More »

Also posted in Orion Gorrao Moreira Campos | Tagged , , , | Comments closed