Parametricism

Headline13-22-2_2

KAFD Metro Station. Visualization: Zaha Hadid Architects

 

Architecture and urban environment have been adapting all the time through the history into the socio-economic and nowadays the technology have been innovating the tools to create an infinite world of possibilities and especially for architecture and urban planning through digital animation techniques.

The employment of animation, simulation, form finding, parametric modeling and scripting, have inspired a new collective movement with radically new ambitions and values. Demanding an increased level of articulated complexity for the Contemporary Avant-grade architecture implementing design tools to design on the basis of parametric design systems. Patrik Schumacher defines the heuristics of parametricism as negative and positive: The negative heuristic is to avoid common and rigid geometry and the repetition of elements. While on the other side, the positive heuristic interarticulate, morph, deform, etc. considering all forms to be parametrically malleable making this a heuristic of almost no boundaries at all with less rules and more flexibility.

Patrik Schumacher proclaims parametricism, as the great new style after modernism although I believe it is soon to think of it as the great new architectural style. Modernism was also not really a style, it was the effort to reconcile the principles underlying architectural design with rapid technological advancement and the modernization of society. If Parametricism is a proper style then it has to be borne of a similar urgent necessity to the one that gave rise to Modernism.

The constant innovations and adaptations nowadays have allowed us to explore more complex geometries and structures and it is impossible to think of stopping innovating and stay static in this world. We have to let the time tell us if Parametricism has a long term future, we need to let it evolve and explore all of it’s possibilities. I personally want to research about this new “style” (Though I believe that there’s no point on claiming a style of today for any reason other than the glory of narcissism) to recognize, measure and simulate the complex patterns and simply work in whatever manner is more suitable for this movement.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Schumacher’s Parametricism & Digital Concepts

Patrick Schumacher presents himself as a strong advocate of Parametricism. In this text he claims that it responds to the complex and heavily consumerist issues of society, merging urban landscape with architectural prototypes to establish seamless, fluid, and continuous forms. The style of the article is written in a unilateral way, but this approach raises questions about Parametricism, as a global style or design tool.

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Digital Logics / T6

httpwww.buildersmagazine.rouploadsarticole206_taiwan_tower_P02.jpg

 Digital Logics

Patrik Schumacher – Parametricism – A New Global Style

Yokohama Ferry Terminal – FOA Architects

Parametricism is introduced by Patrik Schumacher as a fresh approach to design with digital tools, where the ‘tools’ actually morph into a fully-fledged style, well suited to large scale urban planning as well as interior design.

According to Schumacher, this avant-garde style closes the transitional gap between the modernist/postmodernist, deconstructivist/minimalist era and present day, fulfilling most necessities due to its relevance in all scales. Its adaptability is also highlighted by its morphological nature and therefore superior capacity to articulate programmatic complexity.

Due to the increasing demands of the socio-economic state nowadays, ‘retooling’ was a necessary step. The increasing demand can be addressed by a rich panoply of parametric techniques: animation, simulation, form-finding tools, parametric modeling and scripting.

With this palette of techniques architects across the world strive to solve systematically connected problems. The over and above aesthetic recognisability as well as the wide spread, long term consistency of shared design ambitions and problems could justify the enunciation of a ‘style’.

A further aspect of parametricism as a style are its ‘heuristics’, as Schumacher describes them. Positive and negative heuristics dictate the rules with which parametricism as a style is to be approached.  Avoidance of linear shapes (squares, triangles, etc) is key as well as pursuing paths of research, guiding principles and preferred techniques  (parametric), which allow the work to fast forward in one direction.

Therefore the deep relationality is able to further coordinate pragmatic concerns and articulate them with all their rich differentiations and relevant associations. Even though the increased relational and digital logics aid in complex tasks, the new ‘style’ fails to live up to its full potential. Schumacher is reacting to the present state of things in the form of binary ideas, however he is not exploring further, or even attempting to envision a future, rather preferring to develop parametricism as a reaction to current situations.

The envisioning of the Yokohama terminal in its existent form was almost impossible with analogue techniques. The ease of execution would have been greatly increased through parametric techniques.

The interconnection of public spaces, structure and the existing pier can be viewed as a complex relational problem, possibly solved by digital relation tools. Great emphasis was put on the interrelation of these aspects, creating smooth topological transformation. Even without computational techniques the continuity between its different levels as well as the existing elements was overcome elegantly.

Though parametric techniques were not used exclusively, seismic activity was analyzed, monitored and relayed into the design using parametric means, ensuring horizontal and vertical forces are absorbed, as well as overall structural correspondence.

The execution of the Yokohama terminal highlights the associativity between part to whole, articulating the interconnecting elements in an elegant simplified manner. However the potential for greater efficiency of implementation as well as heightened speed at which such a project could have been completed remains open. No doubt parametric techniques would have aided the design hugely.

I am interested in the potential parametricism has in the future when certain design constraints and possibilities which have not been discovered or explored yet, may surface. It is also interesting to ponder whether parametricsm in such cases would truly evolve into a style or remain more of a design tool.

 

Case Study: Yokohama Ferry Terminal

Case Text: Parametricism ‘A New Global Style’, by Patrik Schumacher

Picture reference: http://www.buildersmagazine.ro/uploads/articole/206_taiwan_tower_P02.jpg

Posted in Philip Serif, Uncategorized | Comments closed

Digital Logics – T2

Case Study: Rolex Learning Center, Lausanna, 2010

Text Assignment: Deleuze and The Genesis of Form, Manuel DeLanda

DeLanda_Deleuze_Rhizome_Interpretation

Photo: https://pathtothepossible.wordpress.com/tag/deleuze-guattari/

Advanced Architecture has developed the capabilities to mathematically and scientifically, transform topological forms, address corresponding structural compositions, introduce complex variation, manipulate data, and even apply algorithmic patterns. These developments in tools and processes are affecting the way in which we think about architecture and how architects define their role in the rapidly-changing field.

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Architecture Machine_T5

PUZZLE22

Image: http://openarchitectures.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/an-interview-with-nicholas-negroponte/

 

Nicholas Negroponte stated a very controversial review about the approach of machines. His dictum was indeed referring about the unsuccessful approach of architects, which are unable to handle large-scale problems and also ignore small-scale issues.  Otherwise, he suggest that in order to achieve environmental humanism is indispensable the use of machines, which is a highly contradictory and sets down the concept of a paradox.

The main five points that the author mentions about the characteristics that an architecture machine must have are the following: the heuristic mechanism, the rote apparatus, conditioning device, reward selector and forgetting convenience.  All this inputs allow the machine to “learn” by itself; but indeed, the machine does not learn or improve, it just increases its data base according to the information that the architect or designer puts on it.

It is a fact that a machine cannot be self-conscious, for the moment. Instead, it needs someone who can create a database, set all the inputs and give the commands. The dictum mentioned by the author is considerably far from reality and underestimate the role of architects by considering the relevance of the architecture machine far above from architects.

To consider that a machine can learn and evolve by itself is nowadays impossible; I personally believe that machines are tools handled by and for people´s benefits instead of considering that machines can actually replace real designers.

I truly believe that the relevance of machines nowadays is really important, due to the necessity of people to stay away the consumerism status that predominates today´s society. In that sense, I would like to research about the impact of domestic machinery and how can it help people to design and produce their own products.

Posted in Juan Diego Ramirez Leon | Comments closed