Relational Logics_ T1- The comparison of the Related Forms

variant-results

² Picture.

 

“Our geometrical analogies weigh heavily against Darwin’s conception of endless small continuous variations; they help to show that discontinuous variations are a natural thing, that “mutations”—or sudden changes, grater or less—are bound to have taken place and new “types” to have arisen, now and then. Our argument indicates, is it does not prove, that such mutations, occurring on a comparatively few definite lines, or plain alternatives, of physic-mathematical possibility, are likely to repeat themselves…” ¹

Since ancient times, the use of mathematics has been a boon for man, for the understanding of natural phenomena (physical, chemical, mechanical, etc.), but this resource has not been used to understand why the forms of natural world around us are how they are.

What D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson poses is to explore the extent to which it could describe the relationship between the forms of some living things through the use of basic or simple mathematics, specifically through the Cartesian plane; using several case studies, like the leaves of different species of trees, bone structure of different species of crocodiles shows as part logic is applied and indeed are formal relationships in these case studies.

One of the most important aspects of this thesis is the questions on the theory of Darwinian evolution, arguing that the question of how birds descended from reptiles is still not yet answered in those days (1917), suggesting that the role of evolution has been overrated and therefore mathematics as a tool to study these relationships has been underestimated. Even today it seems that this thesis is still quite advanced and effective, since even supporters and detractors find these ideas.

If we focus on the basic idea of this thesis, it can find a close relationship with what is currently happening in the world based on the use of computers and failing in the use of algorithms for the development of the design, so therefore it is vital to understand the potential of understanding of this thesis and how this can help us to work on a range of endless possibilities, but in turn, controlled by the use of mathematics.

However, a question comes to my mind when D’Arcy Thomson raises this thesis, which is that do men perhaps, in his eagerness to control everything that is around us, manipulates the resources that calculates everything that is around us, especially nature? Is nature really something you can calculate, evaluate, measure, etc. therefore control it?

 

¹ D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson, On Growth and Form, 1917.

² Picture:  http://spatialpixel.com/generative-design-variants/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments closed

Toward a Theory of Architecture Machines. (1969)

1966 Life Magazine

1966 Life Magazine

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Digital Logics.T1

2418f3a1fcd546cc2299bc06c95f4932

(Bassil Taleb, Sequential Transformation)

D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson  

”On the Theory of Transformations” (“On Growth and Form” , 1917)

D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson wrote his book in the beginning  of XX century, in 1917. He was one of the first scientists that explored the connection, and tried to blur the boundaries between biology and mathematics. Large part of “On Growth and Form” is devoted to transformations of biological shapes and forms viewed  as mathematical and physical methods. This chapter is highlighting mathematical descriptions of  how physical processes affect biological changes.

Thompson uses grid systems and presents us his theory of coordinates. This theory expresses that transforming the grid we can see  a mathematical logic in the evolution and biological growth. Thompson gave a lot of examples of forms represented nature: bones, leaves, skulls and so on,  and explanations  of changing shapes of one species according mathematical system of coordinate. Some images he used was taken from the artist and mathematician Albrecht Dürer’s work on proportion: “De Symmetria Partium in Rectus Femoris Humanorum Corporum Libri”.   D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson uses four basic types of deformation of the Cartesian grid of coordinates to learn the development of the biological shapes:

1. Linear variations along XY axis (fish eye resembles human eye after that kind of transformation)
2. Non-linear transformation which is based on logarythmic definitions
3. Shear concept – usage of various angles to transform
4. Radial transformation – in which one set of lines are represented as radiating from a focal point, while the other set is transformed into circular arcs cutting the radii orthogonally.
By comparing bones, leaves, skulls etc. Thompson shows us the organic shapes and forms as a diagram that explains mathematically the history of the evolution.
It is interesting how nowadays this knowledge and the study of  biological transformations in general can be related and connected to new technology, digital tools. there are a lot of examples how architectural forms imitate the nature. I think it could be interesting to research about how nature adapts to its surroundings, so that we could understand how to create and manipulate parametrical forms connecting them to a certain environment.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

BLUR building and A Thousand Plateaus_Rhizome. T3

                                                                                                                                                              downtownParcelCodedPersp

An idea of building. BLUR building. Water is used here as an expression of a process rather then a material in itself. Parameters controlling the behavior of this process makes it interactive as an environment rather then an object.

The lines defining individuality as a container has been blurred, like a rhizome. The being in itself is not channeling to be ‘a’ being. The expression is seen as being growing but without dimensions.A process is an assemblage of moments in different times. It can not be thought of as a  composition in the singularity like a stroke. Such rhizomatic behaviors seem to be directionless, yet consists of a higher dimensional growth. It reacts to micro and macro at the same moment. The frames to capture it seems very different yet consists of a similar expression.

The definition of skin in the blur building can be an expression of such rhizomatic behavior. This expression is though weakly expressed and will be perceived weakly with the constrain of ‘act’ and linear thoughts.

As a conceptual notion , defining of a process rhizomatic behavior helps to broaden the horizon and think of networks which otherwise are not thought of. But then to construct it has to be defined within the limited dimensions of communicating.A book is a collection of moments in different times but it has to have a title.

As a possible topic of research into this, I think understanding particle systems and swarm behaviors responding to a live data feed will be a good approach.

Image Credit - http://city.stamen.com/digital_city/01/

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

T3 – Rhizome

Going against the arborescent structure, where the society follows a linear and hierarchical system, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari proposed a new system based on multiplicity and connections, defined as Rhizome.

women_are_heroes_rio_de_janeiro

    Women Are Heroes, JR (2008) – Favela Morro da Providência, Rio de Janeiro – Brazil.

Read More »

Posted in Wilton Neves | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed