Assignment 2

Posted in S4.Designing Associativity | Leave a comment

Lighting and Solar exposure analysis

There are very interesting things to be analysed, when a classroom is the subject.

First of all, the important thing is having enough natural light reaching everywhere.

LIGHTING ANALYSIS

In Bulgaria (my country) the  regulations require to have at least 300 lux measured in the dark corners of the room, at 70cm distance from the floor (the regular school desk high is 60-70cm depending on the age of the students).

So, in Ecotect, I made a model of a classroom (7,5 x 11meters) facing east with 3 regular windows with 4,4m2 each (or 13,2m2)  and a desk at the darker corner of the room which is 70cm from the floor.

the model

I measured the light at 10am in the morning, on 21st of december (when the light conditions are worst). From the analysis I can see that the light at the corners is not enough for the requirements. And as a result, I need bigger windows

The windows here have a surface of 5,5m2  (or 16,5m2 for all of them). As a result, the lux measured at the darker corner of the desk is close to 370lux, so now I can say that the result is good and it can meet the regulations in Bulgaria.

THERMAL ANALYSIS

Lets start again with a geometry made in Ecotect. I will use the same classroom, for which I already know how big windows should be. But to make it more real, I will have to use a corridor zone behind the classroom, and 2 more classrooms surrounding my zone which I will explore. The idea is having more options and things to change.

Firstly, lets see how the room is performing if there are 30 kids (65W each-typing) inside all of the classrooms, but the materials are standart (single brick walls etc.). The operation hours are set to weekdays only between 7:00 and 18:00. The air change rate for the classrooms are 0,5 and for the corridor is set to 2. Natural ventilation system.

winter period

summer period

We can see, that during the time of occupancy the temperatures inside the classroom are almost equal and are close to the lower normal conditions (18-25 degrees) even though the temperature outside is very different. That is because of the high U-value of the standard materials of Ecotect, which allows the temperature losses during the time when there is nobody in the classrooms. However, 30 kids typing (65W) are enough to heat up the room close to 18 degrees. However, this is not enough for a classroom and other problem is that the first 1 hour is very cold through the year and it takes time for having close to normal conditions inside.

In Bulgaria, the National standard requires different (far lower) U values for the materials used in constructions. The requirements are: walls inside-not more than 0,5; doors/windows-not more than 2; walls (exterior) – not more than 0,35; roofs, slabs etc (exterior) – not more than 0, 25; etc.

winter period-BG National standard materials

summer period-BG National standard materials

We can see, that now, using the Bulgarian National standard materials for all seasons we have comfortable temperature inside the classroom that does not depend on the occupancy so much. Also, there is no more 1 hour uncomfortable temperature period before having normal temperatures inside like in the previous graph. On top of that, we can see that during the summer period, there is no need for occupancy, the temperatures are constantly between 22-24 degrees, doesn`t matter of how many people are there.

But can we spend less money from somewhere? What about having cheap windows with higher U-value (single glazed)

winter period-BG materials-cheap windows

summer period-BG materials-cheap windows

During the summer period, we can see that with cheaper windows there is almost no difference, but during the winter period, the classroom is almost cold, even when there is occupancy inside. And 18 degrees are not enough for sitting kids. So, good windows are must.

It is interesting to see how things are different during the winter (the worst case), if there are no kids in the other classrooms but only in the classroom where we are making the thermal analysis.

winter period-no kids in the other classrooms

Conclusions:

Low U-value walls, roofs, windows, etc worth investing in climate conditions like in Bulgaria.

The occupancy does not make a big difference when a good materials were used.

The cheap windows are not good enough because of the cold winter. During the summer, there is no difference. So maybe for hot climates, expensive windows are not the key, but a good isolation on the roof, walls, etc.

Posted in S5. Environmental Performance Modelling | Tagged | Leave a comment

Interactive systems

1.  Stepper motor receives rotate command from laptop. This movement triggers piezo sensor1 which activates machine2.
2.  The motion produced by machine2 activates piezo sensor2 which activates machine3.
3.  Machine3 randomly roves and draws.

SCRIPT CODE

#include <Stepper.h>

// change the steps variable to the number of steps on your motor
int steps = 100;
int switchPin  =  9;
int chipPin1 =  10;
int chipPin2 =  11;
int dollPin1 =  8;
int dollPin2 =  12;
int piezoPin1 =  5;
int piezoPin2 =  4;

// create and attaches a stepper motor
// with 100 steps to pins 0, 1, 2 and 3

Stepper stepper(steps, 14,15,16,17);

void setup()
{
pinMode(switchPin,INPUT);
digitalWrite(switchPin,HIGH);
// set the speed of the motor to 20 rpms
stepper.setSpeed(50);
stepper.step(50);
pinMode(dollPin1, OUTPUT);
pinMode(dollPin2, OUTPUT);
pinMode(chipPin1, OUTPUT);
pinMode(chipPin2, OUTPUT);
Serial.begin(9600);
Serial.println(”hello world”);

}

void loop()
{
Serial.println(analogRead(piezoPin1));
if (analogRead(piezoPin1) > 1) {
for (int i=0;i<50;i++) {
digitalWrite(dollPin1, HIGH);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, LOW);
delay(50);
digitalWrite(dollPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, HIGH);
delay(200);
digitalWrite(dollPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, LOW);
}
Serial.println(analogRead(piezoPin2));
}
if (analogRead(piezoPin2) > 2) {
for (int i=0;i<5;i++) {
digitalWrite(chipPin1, HIGH);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, LOW);
delay(500);
digitalWrite(chipPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, HIGH);
delay(500);
digitalWrite(chipPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, LOW);
}
}
if (Serial.available() > 0) {
int dataIn = Serial.read();
switch(dataIn) {
case(49):  // number 1
stepper.step(50);
break;
case(50):
stepper.step(-50);
break;
case(51):
stepper.step(50);
break;
case(52):
stepper.step(-50);
break;
case(53):
stepper.step(-10);
break;
case(54):
for (int i=0;i<10;i++) {
digitalWrite(dollPin1, HIGH);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, LOW);
delay(random(50));
digitalWrite(dollPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, HIGH);
delay(random(50));
digitalWrite(dollPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, LOW);
}
break;
case(55):
for (int i=0;i<10;i++) {
digitalWrite(chipPin1, HIGH);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, LOW);
delay(random(100));
digitalWrite(chipPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, HIGH);
delay(random(100));
digitalWrite(chipPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, LOW);
}
break;
}
}

delay(100);
/*
if (digitalRead(switchPin) == HIGH) {
// move 20 steps forward
stepper.step(50);
}
else {
stepper.step(-50);
}
{
digitalWrite(dollPin1, HIGH);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, LOW);
delay(2000);
digitalWrite(dollPin1, LOW);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, HIGH);
delay(2000);
digitalWrite(dollPin1, HIGH);
digitalWrite(dollPin2, LOW);
delay(2000);
}
digitalWrite(chipPin1, HIGH);
delay(5000);
digitalWrite(chipPin2, LOW);
delay(10000);
*/
}

Posted in RS3. Digital Tectonics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

house in greece environmental performance study

For the purpose of this seminar I am going to study the environmental performance for a house of 140 m2 I designed which is currently being under construction. During the design of the house I used the theoretical backgound of sustainable design.In this assignment I am  going to use Ecotect in order to 1) assess the so far design choices made 2) optimise the environmental performanceof the design through moderate changes in shading elements types and materials.

One of the most important decisions in design was the house’s orientation. In order to maximize the solar gains in winter and minimise them during summer the houses largest percentage of openings were orientated towards the south.

summer incident solar radiation

winter incident solar radiation

In a diagramatical comparison of the total incident solar radiation expressed in cumulative values we see in the summer the house gets less exposed to incident solar radiation than in the winter due to its orientation.

By conducting thermal analysis on the actual orientation of the house we get  total number of 17296932 Wh for heating and cooling gains on a fully airconditioning model.

On a hypothetical 37 deg rotation of the North  (which would place the house orthogonally to the site) the same analysis we get the sum of  16247432 Wh

Although, the same analysis on an only heating model proves that the thermal confort is covered by a percentage of that ranges from 86.2% to 89.6% . The conclusion could be that the house could function without cooling systems supporting it.

annual distribution of temeratures in fully air-conditioned model (zone6)

On a hypothetical 37 deg rotation of the North  (which would place the house orthogonally to the site) the same analysis proves that the percentage of thermal confort drops to 82.5%-87.9% while the thermal analysis on the actual orientation of the house provides a number of 17296932 Wh for heating and cooling gains on a fully air-conditioning model.

For the master bedroom (zone 5) two different types of shading were tested through the software: vertical  and rotated louvres.

VERTICAL LOUVRES
HOURLY TEMPERATURES – Saturday 30th June (181)

Zone:  Zone 5
Avg. Temperature:  26.1 C  (Ground 17.9 C)
Total Surface Area:  86.400 m2 (540.0% flr area).
Total Exposed Area:  56.800 m2  (355.0% flr area).
Total South Window:  0.000 m2 (0.0% flr area).
Total Window Area:  3.340 m2  (20.9% flr area).
Total Conductance (AU):  84 W/°K
Total Admittance (AY):  322 W/°K
Response Factor:  3.57

ROTATED LOUVRES
HOURLY TEMPERATURES – Saturday 30th June (181)

Zone:  Zone 5
Avg. Temperature:  26.1 C  (Ground 17.9 C)
Total Surface Area:  86.400 m2 (540.0% flr area).
Total Exposed Area:  56.469 m2  (352.9% flr area).
Total South Window:  0.000 m2 (0.0% flr area).
Total Window Area:  3.340 m2  (20.9% flr area).
Total Conductance (AU):  83 W/°K
Total Admittance (AY):  321 W/°K
Response Factor:  3.58

From the comparison in these two cases we see a minimal increase on the responce factor and a 0.331 m2 decrease on the exposed area. Therefore the impact of the orientation of the louvres is minimal on a horisontal  placement.

Posted in S5. Environmental Performance Modelling | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

GREEN CITY

Posted in RS1. Emergent Territories | Leave a comment

MORPHotels

This project intends to develop a new luxury hotel concept where the user has the opportunity to live an experience in a floating system moving around the world. The MORPHotels, thanks to their linear structure, developed around the vertebral spine, are able to adapt the shape according with the weather conditions and the site morphology.

The MORPHotels concept is based on four main strategies: SPACE IN BETWEEN: using the sea not only as a medium to move tourist from one point to another (like cruise ships) but take advantage from this “space in between” in order to discover unknown places; PLUG-IN CITY-ARBOUR: this artificial organism, during its continuous journey around the oceans and the seas, will stop for short or long periods in cities met throughout its trip becoming a temporary extension of them; ADAPTIVE SHAPE and FLOATING MOVEMENT.

SPACE IN BETWEEN: avoiding the classical logic of the cruise ship (with average cruise speed around 20 nodes the fuel consumption is 470 Liters/Km) this system would change the rules about the sea trips; the MORPHotels is always in movement with slow speed around the world and the tourist has to catch up it wherever it will be. The user won’t use it like a cruise ship that start from point A, reach the end point (B) and go back; here the segment A-B is only a small part of the entire-endless way of the MORPHotel.

PLUG-IN CITY-ARBOUR: as a temporary extension of the hosting city, the MORPHotel will be an added value for the citizen that are taking advantage from its services (theater play, commercial area) and at the same time the tourist and the city life will switch on a new contact.

Posted in RS2. The Self-sufficient Building | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Assignment III

Posted in S4.Designing Associativity | Tagged , , | Leave a comment