Category Archives: Digital Logics – Critical Readings

“Street Level”

By Steven Johnson. Chapter 2.


Summary.
This reading describes the behavior of ants, living cells, and people, and how their individual (inter)actions follow and provoke a global system behavior. Global behavior, local interaction.
There was a study which revealed a completely new way of understanding ant colonies and their behavior. The normal approach was to study several ant colonies, but instead they focused on one single colony over time. They discovered that colonies display a sort of an aging behavior, as a whole organism, through steps such as infancy, adolescence and matureness. Taking in count that colonies can live for 15 years and ants for 1 year, the question is how such simple organisms as ants can achieve a global result that far exceeds their live time and awareness.
It is assumed that ants wouldn´t be able to have an understanding of the colony as a whole or plan its development. So how is it that they know how to act individually, so that the colony survives? Local feedback, decentralized planning. This might be explained by noticing that ants have sort of tasks assigned. They just know they have to bring nutrients to the colony and defend their territory. Then their behavior depends on the interaction between the ants, sharing information about where is food, what nutrients they need, threatening and menaces, etc. The global behavior comes from this interaction between more simple activities of the basic units.
Code: nutrients=information
Similar behavior can be seen in the cell interaction of living organisms. The global actions begin with the interaction between the cells, and the transfer of nutrients (information) from one cell to the other through their membranes. In the embryo development, we can notice how cells define whether they will be heart cells, bone cells, blood cells, etc., based on the interaction and the information of the surrounding neighbor cells. DNA acts as a manual that indicates the cell how to become bone, heart, blood, etc., depending on the needs of their environment. As well as the ants, the global coordination depends on the exchange of information and a pre-established frame code of behavior for the basic units.
City simulation
Sims City is a good example of how a set of rules and units of interaction can evolved into apparently more complex systems. The video game depends on the exchange of information between the units of the city that, when enough, display complex global reactions depending on each unit´s feedback to/from the whole system. This is achieved by a logarithm and mathematics that act like an invisible operator that make thing happen.
Street view
Nature itself appears to have a code for doing things and solving problems, that also governs human behavior. We see behaviors in a galactic scale reflected in the atomic scale. Cities become with time into a huge organism of interactions. Humans of course we are more complex units than ants, cells, or computer bits. But the concept is the same. In this way city sidewalks are the spaces on which more of these interactions can take place. You have images, smells, sounds and exchange of information that keeps our brains active, and healthy. Nobody likes traffic jams, the interaction between people from one car to the other is poor compared to our capacity of information processing and interaction. Basically: it is boring and we don´t enjoy it.
Each space configuration that evolved in the cities like restaurants, plazas, parks, stadiums, offer a different code of interaction that we follow and under which things happen between people. This also happens with the recent virtual spaces which will be more and more important in the future. Complex systems offer the opportunity to fulfill our needs and even create new ones. When the interactions are encouraged, intelligence emerges from the exchange of information, so we can fulfill necessities more efficiently, enjoying the complexity.
The understanding of unit interaction is getting more complex through technology, so we can expect more complex and interactive technology in the future. It is just natural.

Personal Research Interest.
Information is the basis for interaction. Interaction defines intelligence. Emergent intelligence comes from the ability to read information and related it in different ways to obtain different results and more information.

Swarm intelligence is repeated throughout nature. We see can it in neurons, ants, shoals and bird flocks. Swarm intelligent systems show similar properties:

-Group of individuals.

-Relatively homogeneous individuals.

-Simple behavior of individuals, which act in response to local information from environment and other individuals.

-Overall behavior by the convention of the individuals.

The information is the element that promotes the action and interaction of the swarms. Information can be transmitted in different ways and channels like chemicals, physical interaction, movement…

Light for example, give us information in the way of color. But our intelligence is not limited to tell as that an apple is red. It tell us that it is ready to be eaten, and that it is going to be sweet. We get an idea of its flavor even before biting it. We already know its smell. The ability to record experiences takes intelligence one step further. New research is being done on how color and sound can relate to transfer information.

Can sound, music and color, be used as medium for information transfer, and what kind of intelligence can emerge from that?

By: Sebastian Alvarado Grugiel. Arquitecto.

Also posted in Digital Logics - Critical Readings, Sebastian Alvarado Grugiel | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Deleuze and the genesis of the form by Manuel de Landa.

poesia_escrita_en_el_adn_full_landscape
This author talks about the beginnings of the form with a particular scientific and artistic vision at the same time. The lecture is base of that Deleuze believes that the form is not spontaneous and the process is the most important on the existent of the form.
In this text he start talking about his disagreement with the philosophers of the western which the theories of the form are like the example of the religious Creationism, where they said that everything begin with a god’s mind, and is then imposed by a command on an obedient and docile matter.
Deleuze gives an example with bubbles, he said that this thing has an endogenous topological form where a topological point starting with the behavior of the molecules from the energy creating a perfect sphere. In the other hand with the same factor it could occur a perfect cube with the same process and evolution.
Other topic that he mentioned was the real and the virtual where if we talk about humans the DNA is the virtual, because it has a lot of potentialities for creating something, and the real in this case are the human as the final result.
Also is very important the way that the author presents the thermodynamic by the example of the two containers with different temperatures of air. He is mention that the physics and thermodynamics cannot help with philosophy of matters because that branch of physics became obsessed with the final equilibrium forms.
Homogenous and heterogeneous are very important concepts in Deleuze work. The ecosystem are compose of many different homogenous spaces like animals and plants where all of them are connected with a specific function that make a perfect system.

Personal research

Is interesting how Deleuze try to explain that with the same process we can have different approaches. It would be very interesting if we try to understand the “virtual” line and factors that the architectures tend to follow, and in the end and start to analyze the “real” of the final form of every topologic on architecture.
If we talk about modernism, how are the virtual for get the result of the project like a modern house, and then compare with contemporary house and make a visualization between the different real or results that we can have just because of the different factors that we have thanks time.

By: Trinidad Gomez.

Also posted in Digital Logics - Critical Readings, Trinidad de los Angeles Gomez Machuca | Comments closed

Unlearning & Learning

P_Wall_alive_flat_web

                                        quote:  http://matsysdesign.com/,  25th of  Nov. 2013

 

 

Machine, the most creative device in the beginning 20-century. It is supposed being asked to do anything, which the mission ordered, by human, or rather saying that it just is able to do, not thinks firstly and do afterwards.

However, if we take the consideration between the human being with computer and labor with machine, we found out that it is the same state. On the other hand, for instance, architecture students or architects use the software to replace the conventional way for the time-consuming work. However, in the unconscious way, we are going to lose our own mind as well as being controlled by the pre-set comment of the software. What is more, we start to design the building, which the software is able to, not we are asking what we can do. If we look back to the previous architects, they always thought the design for the future (for the furthermore machine have not invented).  We shall not put ourselves into the limited box, sometimes forget about the computer, software or technology, it might have more interesting things are going to be happened.

 

constellation_06_groups

 http://matsysdesign.com/2009/06/19/constellations/, 25th 0f Nov. 2013

 

 

For these generations, there are more and more machines which we can use in the 3-dimension way, just like the normal printer, sending file and printing it. It does helps a lot, we don’t need to spend lots of times on making several models to be tested to make sure whether it is working properly or not. Furthermore, we even can see the visible renders in the monitors as well as simulating the natural ways in the new materials which we are going to invent and used in the building façade. Probably, some people might argue that it could not to image or imitate the ecosystem with software, but it cant not to be ignored that the climate has been changing dramatically. We are not able to predict some situation with conventional way.

Last but not least, the ability of machine can do the things which human being is not able to achieve in terms of power, persistence and accuracy. Just in case you can use it in the proper way, not to be used or controlled because of the limitation of machine. Quote from the book, “ unlearning is as important a learning”,  on the other hand, it should be considered in the human thought way .

 

 

by Toward a Theory of Architecture Machines, Nicholas Negroponte, 2010

 

 

Also posted in Chung Kai Hsieh, Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Tagged , | Comments closed

RHIZOMATICS

rhizome-radar-21305479

Rhizome Radar by Peter Nowicki

It is hard to identify what is the central theme of the Duleuze’s and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, but perhaps suggesting centrality is probably the opposite of the message the book advocates. The book is a distinctive model both in it’s ‘non-structured’ writing methodology but also in its call for a different way of thinking and being, in which the concept of rhizome is introduced. The writing allows for interpretation and connections with many subjects or thoughts, and one can easily relate it with architecture especially emerging theories such as parametricism. Many comparisons have been theorised between Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizome model and other emergent like cyberspace and computer networks which started occuring most noticably after the later 1980s. A Thousand Plateaus is an example of such open systems. It advocates an intellectual message in which the only rule would be the avoidance of the rule. The only rules it employs are those required in order to construct a wide array of concepts such as rhizomatic, non- linearity, nomadism, mutiplicity and anarchism. Clear definitions are are highlighted with capital letter, “RHIZOMATICS = SCHIZOANALYSIS = STRATOANALYSIS = PRAGMATICS = MICROPOLITICS”

Read More »

Also posted in Digital Logics - Critical Readings, Karl Francalanza | Comments closed

Redefining the Origin

GENESIS OF FORM

 

Source:   http://loveit.com/loves/P0BYYyrs7EmbZIUgD2ME0sF

The essay “Deleuze and the genesis of form” is written by Manuel DeLanda. Based on the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze.

Deleuze contradicts the western philosophy and its take on genesis of form. In the western philosophy, form is conceived by the external forces rather than the internal forces and the properties of the material. The virtue of the material and the self-generation of form are not taken into account. Read More »

Also posted in Digital Logics - Critical Readings, Juhi Pravin Patel | Comments closed