Swarm Intelligence

david-castro-with-a-swarm-of-bigeye-fish-at-cabo-pulmo-baja-california-sur-mexico-by-octavio-aburto

David Castro taking a shot at an awesome courtship swarm of Bigeye fish at Cabo Pulmo, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Caption provided by Octavio Aburto (via National Geographic Photo Contest 2012)

A critical analysis of the book Swarm Intellignece – Neil Leach, Roland Snooks

What to underline

The bee builds the next cell starting on the corner of other cells, wich are already have two walls built. This simplicity protects the natural growth of the hive,  the contuniuty is necessary for success. Mıcroscale generates simple inputs, wich collectively form the whole. As the organism gets bigger, the possibility to bring the whole information at any given moment to every individual becomes impossible. The set of simple rules and tracable information patterns allow the individual to make decisions. Ant body collectors are not able to sit on a desk and decide how many dead bodies should be carried in wich direction, they just follow little patterns and the job is done.

Read More »

Posted in Ismail Gokhan Catikkas, Workshop Neil Leach | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Genesis of Form

PN1132

                                           PATTERNS IN NATURE

image link :  http://www.beyondstillness.net/ taken on 05/12/13

In the essay by Manuel De landa is talking about the “GENESIS OF A FORM”. He doesn’t agree with the western philosophy that conceives matter as inert element forms that comes from the outside and not from the inside. There are two important factors that help create a form in nature which are Mathematics and Thermodynamics.

Deleuze differentiates form into two categories the first is the “strata” and the “self-consistent aggregates”. The Strata being the “trees” and self- consistent aggregates being the “rhizomes”. Both of these result in isomorphic actual forms, but the one has to do with the fusion of homogeneous elements while the other explains the unification of heterogeneous elements. De landa is also explaining how a form emerges from organizational structure of biological, molecular as well all the socio economic environments.

Deleuze was hugely influenced by mathematics and physics and use these to understand and decompose the virtual form as well as use it as a tool to help in actualization of the virtual. The example he uses for the real and virtual is the DNA, the DNA of the embryo is virtual because it has a lot of potential and real is the embryo that is created along with the external influences.

The Form that is created in nature can be seen growing in many different yet morphological patterns. These patterns repeat, coexists, vary and transform in various life forms. Digital logics deals with parametric, swarm technology etc and with the help of digital tools we can simplify these patterns and understand them. I would like to study more about the patterns in nature and research about it and how it can help in Form evolution of a project.

 

This is a link to  a video done by Yann Pineill & Nicolas Lefaucheux showing how mathematics and diagram go hand in hand .

“Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty — a beauty cold and austere, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music.” —Bertrand Russell

http://vimeo.com/77330591#

Posted in Digital Logics - Critical Readings, Joshua Ranjit Pio John | Tagged | Comments closed

Scripting the Future by Neil Leach and Phillip F.Yuan – Critical essay by Hristo Kovachev

From panel to parametric. The leap between generations.It seems to be just the beginning.JPEG http://ffffound.com/image/058618b48c6936b372880e7ccd793a8709e27b75?c=10764830 ;http://www.shukino.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/20130703129.jpg

“Like the experimental theories that opened up so many potential lines of research from the Macy Conference, which are so pervasive and embedded in our society today, the premise raised here is to connect the aspect of the computational processes of design, in our case, scripting, to the processes of inhabitation, or experience. When experience and method becomes fused into a co-evolving process, what evolves is an architectural machinic relationship embedded in the broader discourse of the discipline. We are encroaching on a social shift that is changing due to rapid development in processual operations. We constantly mediate between the real world and the digital world, through the virtualizations of infrastructure.”"  - page 165/Chapter : Scripting Intelligent Infrastructures and Building Societies.

I have not seen one single example of connection between the processes of scripting and inhabitation anywhere in the book. My believe is that if an author speaks about some major effort to the public ( because quite frankly this is the meager effort here – to overlap the huge gap between 3D and reality) he should give an example of this effort or at least propose a probable solution. Or in the very least talk about a probable solution, witch is not the case.  I did spot a similar problem with the next sentence. The Author just makes a statement  without providing any evidence about this encroaching on a social shift. Its true that society is constantly changing, now more rapidly than ever, because of the rapidly changing technology. Technology that allows us to change our surroundings in every aspect in ways bot known and unknown, imaginable and unimaginable. But if we are speaking about a specific shift in society, than I expect some examples. Read More »

Posted in Hristo Kovachev, Workshop Neil Leach | Comments closed

Homeomorphism

 Mug  &  Donut

Mug & Donut

Thompson is a “genius”  descriptive and analytical , Biology + Mathematics = on growth and form , in a context where the theory of evolution was overrated and had no mathematical or physical basis, a formal and structural analysis that led to the morphogenesis and put it in the line of scientific and artistic time known to this day. Read More »

Posted in Daniel Ricardo Giraldo Rivera, Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Comments closed

Toward a Theory of Architecture Machines by NICHOLAS NEGROPONTE

Atessa Zandi-Toward a Theory of Architecture Machines

 

Intro
When a designer makes a machine that can solve problems, the designer gets credit. When a machine like this can find a method of finding a method of solution, the machine is the one who makes the answer. The machine may be more creative than the designer.

The evolutionary Machine
This paper is about machines that can learn about learning about architecture. These are called architecture machines. When an architect and an architecture machine can work together, this can make an evolutionary system. Computers are useful tools, which do everything that a human will command it to do. Why do we need a machine to be able to learn?
Most things that a computer does make things only work faster. If computers worked smarter as well, then things would be more efficient.
Two concerns in machine assisted architectureArchitects can’t handle large scale problems because they are too complex. But architects ignore small problems because they seem unimportant. Because of this, architects rarely get to see homes that they designed. 
To allow architects to be able to see the homes they design, it would be helpful to have machines that can learn. The machine would have to be able to respond to its environment.
 
The learning Machine
 
The 1943 theorem of  M and P states that a robot constructed with regenerative loops of a certain formal character, is capable of deducing any legitimate conclusion from a finite set of premises. Learning is can be done from several failures which can lead to success. Failure needs to be recognized.

To be able to recognize failure and learn, an architecture machine needs 5 things: 1) heuristic mechanism, 2) a rote apparatus, 3) a conditioning device, 4) a reward selector and 5) a forgetting convenience.
1) Heuristic narrows the search, or limits the search for a solution. When a problem is observed, the machine will recognize the problem and make sure it doesn’t do anything related to what it just did. Thus it limits even more possibilities.
2) Rote learning is the storing (remembering) of an event and associating it with a response.
3) Responses which are repeated become habits
4) a reward selector
5) unlearning bad habits is as important as learning. This way the machine won’t make the same mistake twice
The whole body (of the machine) will always be changing
One supercomputer could be connected to all the other architecture machines, allowing the machines and the humans who operate them to be able to 1) acquire large bursts of computing power, 2) to acquire stored information, 3) to communicate with other architects and other architecture machines
 
The Seeing Machine
 
Communication is the discriminatory response of an organism to a stimulus. The machine needs a stimulus – a way to sense or observe things that happen in its environment.
For a machine to look like its designer, 3 properties are needed: an event, an idea, and a representation.
In an architect-machine partnership the most important sense (out of the 5 senses: See, touch, hear, smell, taste) is to see. Computer graphics are used a lot.
Oliver Selfridge ‘s “Pandemonium” machine “saw” things and said what it was
It’s possible to build an architectural seeing machine that observes different models
This research helps to learn by focusing on visual stuff
Machine is more of a mannerist than a student but it reverses the fashionable role of computersFor eyes of an architecture machine, problem is the opposite. Given a form, generate the criteria… learn from the criteria and someday generate new forms.
Computers are usually used to store information, which is used to aid an architect in designing something which is then created and observed. An architecture machine could look at something that is created and observed, gather the information, and create something better and new.

Events can be seen, heard, smelt, felt, extra-sensory or a motor command.  In an architect-machine partnership the most important sense (out of the 5 senses: See, touch, hear, smell, taste) is to see. Computer graphics are used a lot. 

Oliver Selfridge ‘s “Pandemonium” machine “saw” things and said what it was.

It’s possible to build an architectural seeing machine that observes different models, and this research helps to learn by focusing on visual stuff.  
Machine is more of a mannerist than a student but it reverses the fashionable role of computersFor eyes of an architecture machine, problem is the opposite. Given a form, generate the criteria… learn from the criteria and someday generate new forms.
Computers are usually used to store information, which is used to aid an architect in designing something which is then created and observed. An architecture machine could look at something that is created and observed, gather the information, and create something better and new.

Posted in Atessa Zandi, Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Comments closed