Digital logics readings analysis Alejandro Martínez del Campo O.

Digital logics readings analysis

T6. Parametricism- A new Global Style for architecture and Urban Design

ZAHA HADID PARAMETRICISM

 

 T6. Individual Summary

 

Parametricism as an increasingly dominant new style among architects, it is rooted in digital animation techniques and it succeeds modernism as a new long wave in systematic innovation. This is how Schumaker introduces this “new” style in the former document.

 

With the new incoming technologies, Parametricism is turning into the most implemented style among emergent advanced architects all around the world. It´s the new area of study in which the architect designs the most efficient connection between the project itself and the society, depending on the scale, location and environment.

 

Along this text Schumaker emphasize that each style has it´s hard core of principles and a characterized way of tackling design problem tasks. In which we could find negative (avoid rigid geometry primitives, juxtaposition and repetition of single elements) and positive heuristics (all forms are parametrically malleable, gradually differentiated and systematically correlated).

The implementation and differentiation of the sub-systems within the whole system is basic during all the design process of the project, integrating object parameters, ambient parameters and observer parameters into the system.

 

The comparison with Le Corbusier´s Modernist urbanism is perfectly explained with the metaphor of the human and the donkey, in which he explains that the human as a superior being, walks in a straight line to reduce distance and time, while the donkey walks in a undefined curvy line avoiding the sun and different obstacles. This is exactly the difference between parameticism and modernism, where one style tries to design in a ordered and humanly logical way, and the other works with the path/line of less resistance.

 

As a way of trying to explain these donkey path connections, the author uses Frei Otto´s experiments and experience while showing the three fundamental types of configurations, which are, direct path networks, minimal path networks and minimizing detour networks, which somehow explain how nature itself creates its own connection in a different way as modernism does, and these is exactly what parametricism tries to achieve, creating more organic designs for the emergent projects and mostly urban territories.

 

Text relationship with other groups Topics during final debate

 

All articles involved in the debate had in one way or another, a relationship with the studied digital logics.

 

-          Theory of transformation.- talks about how all forms and shapes have a relationship with biological/ nature structures and their mathematical explanation, giving the architect the freedom to create biomimetic shapes and understanding how it works.

-          Deluce and genesis of forms.- criticizes the western way of thinking in which form is as it is for no explainable reason and says that the importance of the shape is in the process in which it becomes like that, in where the external factors directly affect the final form.

-          Rhizome.-  uses a philosophical approach to explain the connection between the roots and the log of a tree, and then again the branches to the tree itself. Here we see a connection with the previous text, understanding that the externalities define the final shape or form.

-          Towards a theory of architecture.- explains the idea of a visionary architect who many years ago proposed the creation of machines that can learn, from their errors and experience while being operated by a parent machine and yet so by humans. Being able to create capacities such as heuristic processes, learning from memorizing, maping information, understanding externalities and conditions and having the ability to forget non-useful data.

 

Personal Research Topic

 

How can rigid geometric primitives interact and help us architects create more efficient parametric designs?

 

This question is trying to plunge in the parametricism way of designing without leaving aside modernism as we know it, in which the architect while merging both ideas and styles can find the perfect solution for upcoming developments and territories. Is it possible to find a bonding line between both ways of thinking, or one them is the main character of this tale called “Creating spaces as nature does”.

 

 

 

Posted in Alejandro Martinez del Campo, Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

RH’[I]‘ZOME

1024x768

[I] is not fixed or subject position . I is the idea of rhizome to understand I is to first
comprehend what rhizome is response to. I sprouts from single seed, producing trunk and
branching out growing in innumerable various permutations and combinations and yet can be
traced from a single origin. I is the reference represents and reflects the world like
absorbent even linguistic as all grows from single origin source. I represent multiplicity
and elimination of linearity of language, one binary over the other. I is revolving and
transforming. I is the internet ultimate symbol of rhizome.

 

Rhizome has no center it continuous to grow without beginning or the end. The main principles
of rhizome are connections, heterogeneity, multiplicity,asignifying rupture, cartography
and decalcomania. Internet language is like rhizome ceaselessly establishes connections
between art, science, social struggles even these language has multiplicities.
multiplicities is neither subject nor object [just relations] and the power of rhizome is
to continuously adapt to other multiplicities. Rhizome has the parallel evolution with the
world. Rhizome is composed of plateaus. Plateaus may be read in any order, emphasizing the
rhizomatic nature of knowledge present infinite number of possibilities.

 

Relations to rhizome has number of possibilities. The one possibilities to explore is to relate
with the architecture.I think architecture acts as a rhizome . Its like a straight line with
infinite number of points connecting the past present and the future. As it is said
architecture is the mother of all arts it also reflects on other factors like economical,
political, linguistic, etc. My research topic is defining these innumerable possibilities and
redefining the architecture for good living.

 

 

Posted in Aditya Kadabi, Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Comments closed

Signs about Signs

 FROM “EMERGENCE: THE CONNECTED LIVE OF ANTS, BRAINS, CITIES, AND SOFTWARE” BY STEVEN JOHNSON. 2001  Chapter Number 2 – Street Level

Theory of dérive - Guy Debord 1956

 Guy Debord (1956) Theory of the Dérive

Steven Johnson explained the idea of a city as a system that celebrates the power of a city in its locality and in the everyday local interactions that keep it alive and evolving. He talks about the insignificant contribution of a small unit derived by interaction at the local level that makes a significant impact on the entire system. In this way the evolution of the ant colonies is similar to the process in which cells organize themselves from organs to organisms. In these scenarios there is no bird’s eye view or a pre conceived master plan of the whole system but an ever evolving plan that thrives on the exchange of information via local communication.

  Read More »

Posted in Akanksha Rathee, Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Comments closed

SESSION 3: SYSTEMS/PROCESS DIGITAL LOGICS: NATURES-INFORMATION

Abstract: The analysis of the critical readings will serve to guarantee the contents exposed in the previous session, focused in exposing the digital logics of advanced architecture.

Six texts will inquire some of the driving theoretical forces in relation to informational concepts in architecture:

T1- Thompson, D’Arcy. “On growth and Form” (1917), Chapter XVII: On the Theory of Transformations, pp.1026-1095.

T2- De Landa, Manuel . “Deleuze and the genesis of form”, Extracted from: http://www.artnode.se/artorbit/issue1/f_deleuze/f_deleuze_delanda.html , pp. 1-6.

T3 - Deleuze, Gilles. “A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Squizofrenia”. Chapter: Rhizome, pp. 1-23.

T4 - Johnson, Steven. “Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software”, pp. 1-15.

T5 - Negroponte, Nicholas. “Toward a Theory of Architecture Machines” Journal of Architectural Education (1947-1974), Vol. 23, No. 2 (Mar., 1969), pp. 9-12.

T6 - Schumacher, Patrik. “Parametricism as Style, Parametricist Manifesto”, London 2008. Architecture and Digital Design Systems, London Met MA 2008, pp. 1-13.

Methodology: The analysis of the texts will be organized according to the methodology of the puzzle (or mosaic). This consists of active and cooperative learning, in four steps:

1) To read individually, and before to the session, one of the texts assigned by the professor;

2) In the classroom, in groups of experts, people who have read the same text, will compare the three main principal, and will solve the doubts arisen after the reading;

3) Also in groups of six students, in base groups, but this time by those who have read different articles, every member will explain to the others his/her comprehension and opinion of the text he/she have read;

4) Finally, every group will expose to the rest of participants, the content and their reflections on one of the texts, opening a debate between all in a public review.

Assignment: Summarize.

Every student will deliver individually a summary in writing to the professor (via IaaC-Blog). Students must explain the relationship between the text under study, with the topics exposed in the final debate, adding an image related to the post. Include a possible topic for personal research suggested in the reading of the text, explained in approximately ten lines.

Posted in Digital Logics - Critical Readings | Comments closed

Tarzan in the media forest, the Toyo Ito’s code

 

ca6996b29d1326171752bcba3ea33306_large

Reading Toyo Ito’s writing, Tarzan in the media forest, you feel dispatched into his architectural journey, a fortieth years journey where the architect deal with his works and the architectural movements he is related whit , in order to determinate an “architectural code” result of  four top events, four buildings which determinate his “code”. Read More »

Posted in Giombattista Areddia, Relational Logic - Critical Readings | Tagged , , | Comments closed